What, if the heavens fall? By Ikechukwu Amaechi

- ✦The ruling follows a trend of judicial interventions in political party affairs, which critics argue is being weaponized to stifle opposition.
- ✦The article draws parallels between current Nigerian political tensions and historical precedents in countries like Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Madagascar, where public frustration led to the ousting of leaders.
- Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court nullified the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and invalidated all party candidates for the 2027 elections.
- Minister Festus Keyamo publicly defended the ruling, asserting that the exclusion of opposition candidates would not cause the 'heavens to fall'.
- Critics argue the judicial ruling is a politically motivated attempt by the ruling APC to eliminate competition, warning that such actions risk social instability.
Following the November 5, ruling of Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which nullified the Senator David Mark leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and invalidated all decisions taken under his watch, including the primary elections that produced the party’s...
Frequently Asked Questions About This Story
What is the legal consequence of Justice Lifu’s ruling on the ADC?
The ruling nullified the leadership of the ADC and invalidated all primary elections, effectively leaving the party with no candidates for the 2027 elections from the presidential level down to the House of Assembly.
Why does the author criticize Festus Keyamo’s stance?
The author criticizes Keyamo for using the 'heavens will not fall' rhetoric to justify the exclusion of opposition candidates, arguing that such arrogance ignores the potential for civil unrest and the necessity of judicial integrity.